Brian R Corbin's Reflections on Religion and Life

Living Your Faith as Citizens and Leaders in Politics, Culture, Society and Business

EJ Dionne’s op-ed in WASH POST: Catholic Relief Services mentioned….

Living Their Faith in Afghanistan

By E. J. Dionne Jr.
Thursday, December 25, 2008; A19

 

Each era depicts Jesus in its own way, and the late historian Jaroslav Pelikan wove a brilliant book around this theme. He traced images of Jesus from the earliest days of Christianity as “the rabbi” and “the king of kings” to more modern portrayals as “the teacher of common sense,” “the poet of the spirit” and “the liberator.”

The Jesus of Christmas, Pelikan tells us in “Jesus Through the Centuries,” owes a particular debt to Saint Francis of Assisi, who preached “a new and deeper awareness of the humanity of Christ, as disclosed in his nativity and in his sufferings.”

It was Saint Francis who, in 1223, set up the first creche in the Umbrian village of Greccio, depicting Christ’s infancy in the less-than-regal circumstances of the manger. Saint Francis founded a religious order that stressed liberation from the tyranny of material possessions and, Pelikan notes, the role of Christians as “strangers and pilgrims in this world.”

The world is still blessed with many actual Franciscans. But in our time, there is another community of “strangers and pilgrims” whose satisfaction comes not from accumulating material goods or political power. They are the relief workers and community builders lending their energy to the poorest people in villages and urban slums around the globe.

Many of them are motivated by religious faith, others by a humanistic devotion to service, but few who are in the trenches worry much about what their co-workers believe about an Almighty. These souls are among the happiest and most personally satisfied people I’ve encountered, suggesting that Saint Francis was on to something in preaching freedom from materialism.

Matt McGarry, at 30, has enormous responsibilities that he wears lightly. The coordinator of programs for Catholic Relief Services in Afghanistan, he has mastered many trades. His organization focuses on agriculture, water and education in places where the farms are very small, the water is often dirty and children, particularly girls, have never had the chance to go to school.

McGarry doesn’t think of himself as a saint or even as anything special. “I don’t pretend that my life is too arduous or difficult,” he says. “I get to work with incredibly intelligent, committed people. I’ll definitely be up to this for a while.”

Catholic Relief Services is, of course, a faith-based organization, but what’s striking is that the faith of its employees is inherent in what they do, not something they wear on their sleeves. McGarry says his co-workers are not in the field to preach Christianity, even if the fact that they are there bears witness to their faith. Indeed, in most Afghan villages, seeking converts among Muslims would be dangerous. The group avoids preaching the Gospel, and its Afghan staff is overwhelmingly Muslim.

McGarry explains: “We’re not in the business of getting people into heaven. We’re in the business of getting them out of hell.” That would be “hell” in the earthly sense, and it has a specific meaning in a country that has been ravaged by war for three decades.

Those who undertake the sort of work McGarry does are inevitably seen as idealists, but their passions are invested in highly practical undertakings: how to staff a school and protect its children; how to dig wells; how to improve production on small family farms; how to form cooperatives; how to market crops.

Underlying much of his group’s work, McGarry says, is a concern for improving the status of women, both by empowering them in the economy and by offering them educational opportunities they had been denied. He is struck, above all, by the passion of Afghan parents for the education of their children. When a threat arose to one of Catholic Relief Services’ schools, the villagers were indignant. “Nobody’s closing our school,” they told McGarry. “We don’t care if they kill us. We don’t care if they kill our children.” The threat was dealt with, and the school reopened.

It is strange how a faith that traces its origins to a stable, preaches love and demands good works is so often invoked to condemn, to divide and to denounce. “We tend to forget that charity comes first,” wrote Thomas Merton, the inspiring monk who died 40 years ago this month, “and is the only Christian ’cause’ that has the right to precedence over every other.”

McGarry and his co-workers understand those words and live by them. They represent, I suspect, what Saint Francis had in mind 800 years ago when he built his manger.

Filed under: Catholic Relief Services, consumerism, morals, Social Justice, Spirituality

Pope: Parties Can Be Organized, But Joy Is a Gift

ZE08122403 – 2008-12-24
Permalink: http://zenit.org/article-24665?l=english

Says It Has Been Given in Abundance

 

VATICAN CITY, DEC. 24, 2008 (Zenit.org).- Benedict XVI says that joy is a gift, a fruit of the Holy Spirit, and that in this gift, all others are summed up.

This was one of the Pope’s reflections Monday when he met with the Roman Curia and other officials for the traditional exchange of Christmas greetings.

“A party is an integral part of joy,” the Holy Father acknowledged. “And a party can be organized, but joy cannot.

“It can only be offered as a gift; and, in fact, it has been given us in abundance. That’s why we feel grateful.”

The Pontiff recalled how St. Paul lists joy among the fruits of the Holy Spirit and in the same way, St. John unites the Spirit and joy.

“Joy is the gift in which all other gifts are summed up,” the Bishop of Rome affirmed, just a few days before Christmas. “It is the expression of happiness, of being in harmony with oneself, something that can only be derived from being in harmony with God and his creation.”

And, he continued, “part of the nature of joy is spreading itself, having to be communicated.”

The mission of the Church, the Pope explained, “is nothing more than the impulse to communicate the joy that has been given us. May it always be alive in us, and then, may it irradiate to the world in its tribulations: This is my wish for the end of this year.”

 

Filed under: consumerism, Culture, Papal Teachings

Looking for that right gift for Christmas? Be “just” Consumers

Fair Traded gifts — art works, jewlry, chocolate, tea, coffee and more — are wonderful expressions of using your money to support local artisans and farmers while sharing a gift with that special person.

Visit Catholic Relief Services/SERRV for Fair Traded gifts.

See related story about coffee in Mexico…..

Filed under: consumerism, Culture, Market Place

Check out Interview of Corbin by Tyler Clark

http://blog.tylersclark.com/2008/12/interview-with-brian-corbin.html#links

Filed under: Personal Reflections, Uncategorized

Free Market and Morality: Some experts debate. What do you think?

 

 

The Free Market and Morality

Experts Debate Ethical Pros and Cons

 

By Father John Flynn, LC

ROME, DEC. 14, 2008 (

Zenit.org

).- As economic indicators continue to nosedive, debate over the free market continues apace. On Dec. 3 the John Templeton Foundation hosted a forum in London to address the issue.A group of economists and commentators gathered to debate the topic: “Does the Free Market Corrode Moral Character?”

Michael Walzer, retired professor in the School of Social Science at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey, argued that free market competition forces people to break the rules of decent conduct. Attempting to justify this behavior leads to self-deception that corrodes moral character, he said.

Competition is not, however, only a negative force, Walzer added. Cooperation in economic enterprises produces mutual respect, friendship and solidarity, and people learn how to take risks and forge alliances.

Walzer proposed limitations on economic power and markets so as to reduce the corrosion due to market forces.

Kay S. Hymowitz, the William E. Simon Fellow at the Manhattan Institute, also warned against the negative effects of the free market on morality. The modern market economy introduces many novelties that undermine established cultural and moral traditions, she argued.

As well, stimulating the desire for more and more goods can lead to a weakening of self-discipline and our sense of moral obligations. In addition, the free market often promotes a sense of autonomy and hedonism that is particularly corrupting for families with little cultural formation.

Nevertheless, she admitted, the same market forces can help children and adolescents realize the need for discipline and study if they wish to achieve success in a competitive world.

Not black and white

John Gray, retired professor at the London School of Economics, took a similar view to Walzer, observing that free markets corrode some aspects of character, while enhancing others.

Gray recommended against relying too much on concepts of ideal models. In practice, he added, free markets rarely work according to the abstract economic models. As well, free markets are not simply the absence of government controls, as all markets depend on systems of laws and regulatory constraints.

Gray warned, however, that even though the free market system is imperfect and also tends to corrode some moral values, it does not follow that other economic systems are better.

“Centrally planned systems have corroded character far more damagingly and with fewer benefits in terms of efficiency and productivity,” he adverted.

John C. Bogle, president of the Bogle Financial Markets Research Center, premised his remarks by saying that it depends on what kind of market we are talking about.

The current financial crisis, Bogle maintained, is not really an indictment of markets, but is more due to a change from what he termed an “ownership society,” dominated by individual investors, to an “agency society,” where corporate managers dominate.

In the early 1950s, he explained, individuals held 92% of all U.S. stocks. Today, however, institutions and pension funds hold 75% of stocks. Bogle accused the managers of these institutions of putting their own interests ahead of the interests of those people whose money they are charged with investing.

Short-sighted

Another corrupting influence has been the focus of investment strategies on short-term speculative gains, as opposed to long-term investing.

When it comes to the question of moral character Bogle said that the trend to moral relativism in recent times has eroded the force of ethical principles that once restrained people. The solution, he concluded, is to return to a purer form of the free market and to recover genuine moral virtues.

By contrast, Robert B. Reich, professor of public policy at the University of California at Berkeley, said consumers bear responsibility for many of the moral flaws in the market.

Frequently consumers avoid dealing with the conflicts between their market impulses and moral ideals, said Reich, who served as the secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. For example, we want goods at the cheapest prices, but ignore the effect this has on keeping wages low for those who make the products.

Then, when we find out about ethical problems associated with consumer goods we often blame the producers and retailers, instead of taking some of the responsibility on ourselves, Reich continued.

Transparency

Reich concluded the market does not corrode our character. Instead, by placing the blame on intermediaries, it allows us to retain our ideals, while making choices that lead to outcomes that, in practice, violate our principles. The solution, according to Reich, is greater transparency in the market, so we are more aware of the consequences of our choices.

Michael Novak, a well-known commentator on economic issues, and the George Frederick Jewett Scholar in Religion, Philosophy, and Public Policy at the American Enterprise Institute, drew attention to the importance of moral values in curbing some of the self-destructive elements within an economy based on the free market.

At the same time Novak observed that the very successes of the market system also tend, over time, to weaken those very moral strengths that are necessary for its success. “A generation committed to saving for tomorrow is replaced by a generation heedlessly living just for today,” he noted.

Therefore, Novak concluded, the greatest task of what he termed a commercial society is to return to its spiritual roots. This means an emphasis on the family, and on forming the next generation in good habits that will ensure a strong character.

Jagdish Bhagwati, a professor of economics and law at Columbia University, took a much more favorable view of markets and also of globalization. Many hold that globalization has harmful side effects, such as promoting child labor or harming the ecology. Bhagwati argued that the consequences are not negative, but rather positive and that globalization has been a force for good.

Moreover, he said, the forces of globalization combined with the Internet means that we are far more aware of problems and difficulties in other countries, which leads to a greater sense of our moral obligations toward others.

Moral defenses

French philosopher, Bernard-Henri Lévy, started his presentation by arguing that when the free market is released from all rules and governed only by the greed of the most powerful it will fatally corrode our souls.

The real world is, however, more complicated and we cannot simply declare that the market is only a negative force. The negation of the market economy that was present on both fascism and communism was by far a more deadly moral force than the free market, he argued.

The market economy, Lèvy noted, develops qualities of initiative, decision-making and creates bonds between people. He even maintained that the free market can reinforce our moral defenses, so long as we refuse the temptation of a capitalism that does not abide by any rules.

“The market, to borrow Winston Churchill’s famous phrase about democracy, is the worst solution, except for all the others,” Lèvy concluded.

Rick Santorum, a former U.S. Republican senator from Pennsylvania and now a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center in Washington, D.C., noted that the free market depends on and rewards many human virtues.

At the same time he warned that the free market does not always coincide with what is virtuous or moral. Santorum recommended keeping in mind what Pope John Paul II said when he distinguished between the true freedom of doing what you ought to do, and the false freedom of doing whatever you want.

Rediscovering what genuine freedom really means may well be one of the keys to overcoming some of the flaws afflicting the economy today.

 

 

Filed under: consumerism, Market Place, morals